We don’t want to drive the vehicles any more. Rather, Ilyas Kanchan, Tarana Halim, and all other culprits who took part in the starvation should be brought on the steering wheel.
This was
the remark of a bus driver on whose vehicle I was heading home the other day.
With due respect to people of all professions, I wasn’t surprised at his harsh
tone or the disparaging comment. Transport workers raving in defiant manners
and throwing abusive comments are nothing new to the general commuters. This is
quite characteristic of them. Many may remember, right before the last
Eid-ul-Fitr when a ferry got stuck in a sunken island in the Padma –– and remained
there for several days –– one of the passengers onboard was beaten by a driver
of a truck owned by shipping minister Shajahan Khan. Interestingly enough, this
was done in front of a rolling TV camera with some journalists present nearby.
However, there are admittedly some transport workers who are gentle in nature
and behaviour.
I was going
home in Khulna on 25 October on a bus from Dhaka. It was dawn when we came to know about an indefinite
transport strike to be enforced in 21 districts across the southwestern region.
In what may be unprecedented, the strike was called by the Bangladesh Road
Transport Owners-Workers Federation led by none other than the incumbent shipping
minister, Shajahan Khan. It was called to press home an 11-point demand
including release of all the detained drivers under article 302, including bus
driver Jamir who caused the death of eminent film maker Tareq Masud and
journalist Mishuk Munir. In their written memorandum, the strikers did not
spell out Jamir’s name but there was an obvious reference to him. Shajahan Khan
himself led the submission of the memorandum. When our bus was stopped in front
of Khulna Maniktala CSD Warehouse, the driver expressed full support to the strike
and promised to put his wheels on hold in solidarity. It was quite interesting
to see that among the road blockers there were many holding placards demanding
trial of the killers of recently murdered BNP labour leader Modasser Hossain.
I knew Shajahan
Khan since 2001 when I was sent to assist our Madaripur Office for a couple of
months. Our office was located at Tarmuguria village, close to the riverbank. We were shacked in the office by the noise of gun firing.
People were watching the firing from the riverbank on the vehicle fleet of
Khaleda Zia, led by Maznu Khan and the brother of Bahaudding Nasim; quick
escape of the escort cops; and counter fire by Mujibur Rahman Sarwar from
the convoy of Khaleda Zia. Actually, since that incident, I knew Shajahan Khan
as a powerful politician. Then, I knew him as a minister, a transport sector
leader, and more recently, as a transport monster.
Since the
beginning of this term of the government led by his party, we observed him involving
himself with various controversies. Once he
proposed to affix ‘rates’ of extortion in road transportation routes across Bangladesh in
the name of ‘subscription’ or in Bengali, ‘chanda’. Somehow the proposal
couldn’t convince his minister-friend Syed Abul Hossain. Mr. Hossain cleared
his position by saying that his ministry (communication) could never approve
such an ‘illegal’ proposal.
Later on, Shajahan
Khan came up with the most bizarre proposal of his term: issuing driving
license to 28,000 drivers without any qualification test. The list proposed by
the president and general secretary of the Federation and endorsed by Mr. Khan
was about to be approved by the ministry of communication. But once again he was
let down by Mr Hossain, thanks to public outcry against the proposition. The unfortunate
killing of Tareq Masud and Mishuk Munir took Shajahan a bit off-guard, but with
the subsequent launch of transport strike he planned to pull up his socks
again. It is relevant to mention that the indignant strikers offered
shoe-necklace on the posters of eminent film actor and the convener of “Demand
of Safe Roads” movement Mr. Ilyas Kanchan. They also beat on his photograph with
shoes.
In these
connections, starvation programme at the Jatiya Shaheed Minar caused a myriad
of debates, discussions, and bloggings, all expressing concern over the
development of situation. But the government reacted in typical manner,
extending blind support and endorsement for whatever its higher-ups say and do,
despite their adverse consequence. Prime Minister Shekh Hasina had thus expressed
her reaction to the masses who gathered at the Shaheed MInar on the Eid day
demanding action against the ministers of communication and shipping:
The people who have gathered here have not travelled home. Then how do they know that they couldn’t travel home due to bad road conditions? If they start for home now, I believe they would reach home in a few hours. They shouldn’t obfuscate people while they aren’t traveling.
Such a
stand by the prime minister against popular demand eventually gave authorisation
to the wilfulness of Messrs. Hossain and Khan.
Though the transport
strike was withdrawn after the commitment of due consideration by Communication
Minister Mr. Syed Abul Hossain, his commitment on Jamir’s release was in a
blur. From his statement, it appears that if Jamir is released, it would be a
decision following the ruling of the court and hence he will clear out of any
controversy.
However, it
was heard that despite the withdrawal of the strike, violence erupted in
several places. Massive vandalism took place in Jessore by the Transport Owners-Workers
Federation led workers including an India-bound bus of Shyamali Paribahan where
the driver and a security constable of Bangladesh Ansar was brutally beaten by
iron rods. A physician-friend of mine was passing by that location by his
private sedan and was ‘forgiven’ by the attackers only because he was a doctor
with a Crescent sticker on his car’s windshield. Vandalism also took place at
Sonadanga Bus Terminal in Khulna
and several other places.
From our previous
experiences we know, it is the general people who become the ultimate victim of
these strike programmes. And now, if the very ministers of a government add fuel
to the subdued fire of a certain quarter of people, it bodes omen and endangers
public life beyond a ray of solution. Surprising but true, no criticism or
pro-people statement has come out from the government about this strike. From
that consideration, it can be argued whether the government itself was in
favour of the strike. If this strike were called by the opposition, certainly
it would have been denounced by the government with media propagation about how
their programme affects peoples’ life and national economy. As a powerful
minister of the government, Mr. Khan had the opportunity (and responsibility) to
negotiate with the relevant ministries of the government as the 11 demands were
relevant with the ministries of home, law and justice, and others. Instead, he
threw the strike programme, causing immense suffering to the masses.
It cannot
be told whether his decision of strike was whimsical or something else. Possibly
he wanted to establish his uncompromising stand before his federation members
by calling the strike. Or, may be it was just a demonstration of power through which
he wanted to convey the message (to his ruling party colleagues and the
opposition) that he alone can halt the whole country if he wishes. God knows
why he would so wish!
Those
who keep abreast of the political developments in this country know what the current
prime minister promised once: that if in opposition, her party would never call
any strike. They are not even in opposition now and they started calling strike
already! How ironic!! While her government is vocal against the strike, road
march and other programmes of the opposition, her silence about the Shajahan
Khan-induced strike indicates that her government has not accepted the
challenge thrown by Shajahan Khan. We have to wait to see his next action. The Federation
has called further strike for an indefinite period of time in Khulna division from 20th November
2011. So, it seems that we have wait for some more time to clearly understand
the ambition of Shajahan Khan.
Photo Courtesy: www.newsbnn.com
